Malaysia

National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan

South-Eastern AsiaApplies 2022–2030Source: Malaysia NBSAP

1. Overview

Malaysia's National Policy on Biological Diversity 2022–2030 (NPBD 2022–2030) sets out the country's framework for biodiversity conservation, sustainable use, and fair and equitable benefit-sharing [§6]. It succeeds the first NPBD launched in 1998 and its 2016–2025 revision, and forms Malaysia's response to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) adopted at CBD COP15 in December 2022 [§6, §8]. The policy's timeline was revised to 2030 to align with mid-term CBD reporting and national priorities [§44].

The policy is organised around 5 national goals, 17 national commitments*Malaysia's NPBD labels its headline pledges "targets." This page uses "national commitment" throughout to avoid confusion with the 23 GBF Targets. Malaysia's 5 "goals" mirror but are distinct from the 4 KMGBF GBF Goals (A–D), and the country's 61 "actions" are treated here as sub-actions or, where a named programme or statute exists, as instruments., and 61 actions aligned with Thematic Area 3 (Sustainable Development) of the 12th Malaysia Plan [§6, §44]. It is built on five principles — biodiversity as national heritage, precaution, shared responsibility, participation (including the recognition of indigenous peoples and local communities), and good governance [§34–§38].

Scope covers terrestrial, freshwater, coastal, and marine realms, with protected-area, species, genetic-resource, biosafety, financial, and capacity dimensions [§6, §44]. The policy calls explicitly for a shift from a whole-of-government to an "inclusive, whole-of-society approach" to conservation [§7].

Malaysia, one of 17 megadiverse countries, commits to 17 national pledges under its NPBD 2022–2030, delivered across a distinctive federal–state architecture covering Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah, and Sarawak. The headline area target is 20% terrestrial and inland waters and 10% coastal and marine conserved by 2030 — below the KMGBF 30×30 figure — with RM500 million in annual public funds committed to mobilisation. The country explicitly anticipates losing multilateral aid access as it graduates from developing-country status and pivots to REDD+, Payment for Ecosystem Services, and blended finance.

Sources:

  • §6 — Executive Summary
  • §7 — Executive Summary > Our Shared Responsibility
  • §8 — Executive Summary > The Need For This Policy
  • §34–§38 — Policy Statement > Principles
  • §44 — Policy Statement > Goal 5

2. Ecological Context

Malaysia is identified as one of 17 megadiverse countries and among the top 12 for species richness and endemism [§9]. Approximately 54.58% of the country's land area remains forested, encompassing national parks, Stateland Forest, Permanent Reserved Forest, and wildlife sanctuaries [§10]. The rainforests are estimated at 130 million years old [§13], and dipterocarp forests are dominated by Dryobalanops, Hopea, and Shorea; the world record for the tallest tropical tree belongs to Shorea faguetiana, documented at 100.7 m in the Danum Valley Conservation Area, Sabah, in 2019 [§10].

The policy records an estimated 15,000 vascular plant species (about 8,300 in Peninsular Malaysia and about 12,000 in Sabah and Sarawak), 306 mammals, 742 birds, 242 amphibians, 567 reptiles, and 2,068 freshwater and marine fish [§10, §12, §13]. Peninsular Malaysia hosts the Malayan tiger, Indochinese leopard, and clouded leopard; East Malaysia is home to approximately 11,300 Bornean orangutans [§12]. Mount Kinabalu alone records over 5,000 plant species, with 40% endemic [§10]. Malaysia holds approximately 2.4 million hectares of tropical peatlands, 641,886 ha of mangrove, and 4,006 km² of coral reefs supporting at least 700 fish species across 53 gazetted Marine Protected Areas [§10, §11]. The country hosts 14 of the 20 seagrass species recorded in Southeast Asia [§11].

Pressures are driven by population growth — projected to reach 38 million by 2030 and 41.5 million by 2040 — alongside housing, industrial, township, and infrastructure expansion [§6, §19]. The policy identifies nearly half of plant diversity as facing various levels of threat [§6]. Key pressures include habitat fragmentation, invasive alien species (notably Salvinia molesta and Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus), pollution (over 0.94 million tonnes of mismanaged plastic per year since 2018), poaching, overinvestment in fishing capacity, mineral extraction within forest habitats of the Central Forest Spine, and climate change — for which a 2 °C rise projects a yearly RM162.53 million economic loss to rice production [§23, §24, §26, §27, §28]. Emerging concerns include zoonotic disease linked to land-use change and the illegal wildlife trade [§25].

Sources:

  • §9–§13 — Biodiversity Treasures of Malaysia
  • §19–§28 — The Challenge Before Us

3. National Commitments and GBF Alignment

The NPBD identifies 17 national commitments under five national goals, operationalised through 61 actions [§44]. They are grouped here by national goal for navigability.

Goal 1 — Empowerment and commitment

National commitment 1 — Public awareness. By 2030, "more Malaysians are aware of the values of biodiversity and the steps they can take to conserve and use it sustainably" [§45, §47]. Maps to GBF Target 1 (spatial planning framing of awareness) and GBF Target 22. Indicators: increased awareness compared to 2024 and a 50% increase in children and youth participating in biodiversity activities compared to 2024 [§50, §54]. Classification: directional aspiration — baseline against 2024 is undefined.

National commitment 2 — Stakeholder roles. By 2030, the roles of IPLCs, civil society, private sector, and academia are "significantly strengthened" [§46, §55]. Maps to GBF Target 22. Indicators include policies to empower IPLCs developed and implemented; a 50% increase in CSO collaborative projects compared to 2024; all public-listed companies reporting on biodiversity initiatives; and at least 30% of research translated into policy papers [§60, §63, §69, §73]. Classification: directional aspiration — mix of directional language and indicators without absolute baselines.

Goal 2 — Reducing pressures

National commitment 3 — Spatial planning. By 2030, terrestrial and marine spatial planning "fully incorporate" elements of biodiversity conservation [§75]. Maps to GBF Target 1. Instruments: National Physical Plan, Environmentally Sensitive Area framework, upcoming National Coastal Physical Plan, revised State Structure Plans, Local Area Plans, National Action Plan on Peatlands, ASEAN Peatland Management Strategy 2023–2030 [§78–§82]. Classification: directional aspiration.

National commitment 4 — Mainstreaming. By 2030, biodiversity "effectively mainstreamed" into development frameworks [§83]. Maps to GBF Target 14, with links to Targets 7 and 19. Indicators span financial-sector integration, sectoral safeguards, EIA strengthening, freshwater and marine pollution improvements compared to 2024, biodiversity-mining provisions, and — by 2025 — establishment of a national consumption footprint with steps to reduce over-consumption by 2030 [§89–§101]. Classification: directional aspiration.

National commitment 5 — Forest governance. By 2030, forest governance is strengthened for biodiversity conservation, with the pre-existing Malaysia Policy on Forestry commitment to maintain at least 50% of land area under forest and tree cover carried into the NPBD [§102]. Maps to GBF Target 10. Indicators include forestry laws reviewed and 50% of the forestry sector certified under MTCS and FSC [§106, §109]. Classification: measurable commitment (50% forest cover; 50% certification thresholds with 2030 deadline).

National commitment 6 — Sustainable production. By 2030, agrofood, agricommodity, and fisheries production are managed and harvested sustainably [§112]. Maps to GBF Target 10 (agriculture/forestry), GBF Target 5 (sustainable harvest/IUU), and GBF Target 18 (subsidy reform language). Indicators include a 60:40 capture-fisheries to aquaculture ratio and optimised gene/seed banks [§120, §128]. Classification: measurable commitment (60:40 ratio, 2030 deadline).

National commitment 7 — Tourism–conservation synergies. By 2030, synergies between tourism and conservation are "fully realised" [§74]. Maps to GBF Target 9 and GBF Target 14. Indicators include certification under the Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria, Green Badge guide certification, and a 30% increase in IPLCs actively participating in tourism development compared to 2024 [§134, §137, §140]. Classification: directional aspiration.

Goal 3 — Safeguarding ecosystems, species, and genetic diversity

National commitment 8 — Protected areas and OECMs. By 2030, at least 20% of terrestrial areas and inland waters and 10% of coastal and marine areas conserved through an effectively managed, ecologically representative system of protected areas and OECMs [§141, §145]. Maps to GBF Target 3. Instruments include a National Framework for Protected Areas, an operational OECMs framework, updated Master List of Protected Areas, and international recognition via RAMSAR, EAAFP, MAB, and ASEAN Heritage Parks [§151, §159, §162]. Classification: measurable commitment — thresholds and deadline explicit, below the KMGBF 30×30 headline.

National commitment 9 — Ecosystem management and restoration. By 2030, threatened natural ecosystems are sustainably managed and degraded ecosystems are restored [§163]. Maps to GBF Target 2. Indicators include an ecosystem vulnerability map and at least 200,000 ha of degraded sites under active restoration [§168, §171]. Classification: measurable commitment (200,000 ha, 2030).

National commitment 10 — Ecological corridors. By 2030, important ecological corridors secured and ecosystem resilience enhanced [§175]. Maps to GBF Target 3. Indicators: 10 primary corridors under the Central Forest Spine initiative actively managed, and a 10% increase of protected areas within the Heart of Borneo [§181, §183]. Classification: measurable commitment.

National commitment 11 — Species recovery. By 2030, targeted management actions in place to enable recovery of threatened species [§187]. Maps to GBF Target 4. Indicator: 10 ex-situ conservation centres active [§198]. Classification: measurable commitment (10 centres, 2030).

National commitment 12 — Illegal take and trade. By 2030, poaching, illegal harvesting, and illegal trade minimised or significantly reduced [§205]. Maps to GBF Target 5. Indicators include a 50% increase in collaborative anti-poaching efforts compared to 2024 and a 20% increase in public awareness from 2018 levels [§211, §218]. Classification: measurable commitment (quantified increases against stated baselines).

National commitment 13 — Invasive alien species. By 2030, measures in place for the prevention, eradication, containment, and control of IAS [§225]. Maps to GBF Target 6, anchored on the National Action Plan on Invasive Alien Species 2021–2025 [§223]. Classification: directional aspiration — quantitative threshold not attached to the headline statement.

Goal 4 — Safe use and equitable sharing

National commitment 14 — Access and benefit-sharing. By 2030, enhanced capacity to implement the ABS Framework [§235, §237]. Maps to GBF Target 13. Instruments: Access to Biological Resources and Benefit Sharing Act 2017, Nagoya Protocol, with digital sequence information (DSI) within scope [§234, §238]. Classification: directional aspiration.

National commitment 15 — Biosafety. By 2030, a comprehensive biosafety system operational [§236, §248]. Maps to GBF Target 17. Instruments: Biosafety Act 2007, Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety [§234]. Indicator: legal framework on liability and redress for LMO damage established [§264]. Classification: directional aspiration, with the liability and redress framework as a discrete deliverable.

Goal 5 — Capacity, knowledge, and skills

National commitment 16 — Implementation capacity. By 2030, Malaysia's capacity to implement the Policy "significantly strengthened" [§267]. Maps to GBF Target 20. Indicators include an active Biodiversity Parliamentary Select Committee and the Malaysia Biodiversity Centre (MBC) established and operational [§281, §285]. Classification: directional aspiration, with MBC operationalisation as a discrete deliverable.

National commitment 17 — Finance. By 2030, a significant increase in funds and financial incentives for biodiversity from government and non-government sources [§288]. Maps to GBF Target 19. Indicator: at least RM500 million mobilised annually through public funds [§295]. Classification: measurable commitment (RM500 million annual, 2030).

Sources:

  • §44–§302 — Policy Statement > Goals, Targets, Actions, Key Indicators (as cited)

4. Delivery Architecture

Federal–state jurisdictional architecture and three-regime coordination

Malaysia's NPBD is implemented across a distinctive federal–state architecture. Management of land, water, and forests falls under State Government jurisdiction under the Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution (except in the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Putrajaya, and Labuan), and State Governments are "essentially the core implementers of the Policy at the State level" [§289, §306]. Three distinct sub-national regimes operate: Peninsular Malaysia (coordinated through State Economic Planning Units/Divisions, with proposed dedicated State Biodiversity Units — UPENs and BPENs), Sabah (the Sabah Biodiversity Centre, SaBC), and Sarawak (the Ministry of Natural Resources and Urban Development, MUDeNR) [§306, §312].

Four tiers of coordination sit above these State Focal Points: the National Biodiversity Council (NBC), chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister; the National Steering Committee for the NPBD, chaired by the Secretary General of the Ministry in charge of biodiversity and forestry; the National Biodiversity Roundtable (NBR) with State Focal Points as the technical advisory layer; and the Thematic Working Groups with the Malaysia Biodiversity Centre (MBC) as the monitoring root platform [§312, §313]. The Meeting of Ministers of the Environment (MEXCOE) facilitates Federal–State communications. A Biodiversity Implementation Support (BIS) initiative rolls out the policy at State level, improving mainstreaming into State development programmes and policy monitoring [§316].

Delivery also draws on multi-sectoral councils — the National Land Council, National Physical Planning Council, Environmental Quality Council, and the National Development Planning Committee — as mainstreaming venues [§313].

Forest and landscape programmes

The Malaysia Policy on Forestry underpins the 50% forest-cover commitment [§102]. Sustainable Forest Management is the governing framework for forest reserves, incorporating the High Conservation Value (HCV) approach; the Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme (MTCS) and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) are the recognised certification schemes [§107, §109]. Action 5.1 commits to regulations governing the excision or re-classification of Permanent Reserved Forest with public consultation and State legislative oversight, and to frameworks regulating long-term forest concessions including REDD+ and other carbon projects [§105].

Species and wildlife crime

The National Red Data List anchors species conservation planning, supplemented by a metapopulation approach integrating wild and captive populations through science-based translocations [§192, §195]. Ex-situ instruments include the Malaysian network of botanic gardens, seed and germplasm gene banks, and specialised conservation breeding facilities [§198]. The ASEAN Wildlife Enforcement Network is to be revived, with investigative and forensics capacity developed with the Royal Malaysia Police [§210]. Primary wildlife laws in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah, and Sarawak are to be harmonised and updated [§220].

ABS, biosafety, and production systems

The Access to Biological Resources and Benefit Sharing Act 2017 gives effect to the Nagoya Protocol, with digital sequence information included within ABS scope; the Biosafety Act 2007 gives effect to the Cartagena Protocol [§234, §238]. Production-sector instruments include a Sustainable Fisheries Framework, species-based Fisheries Management Plans, Turtle Excluder Devices, electronic bycatch monitoring, a Sustainable Aquaculture Framework, and the Fisheries (Inland Fisheries Aquaculture) Rules [§119, §121, §123]. Agricultural instruments cite No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) policies, the HCV approach in farms and plantations, and certification via the Malaysian Palm Oil Certification Council (MPOCC) [§117].

Sources:

  • §102–§313 — Policy Statement > Roles and Responsibilities; Implementation Framework (as cited)
  • §316 — Implementation Framework > BIS

4a (Flex) — Landscape-scale connectivity: Central Forest Spine, Heart of Borneo, Coral Triangle

Three named landscape-scale programmes carry Malaysia's connectivity commitments across terrestrial, tri-national, and marine realms. The Central Forest Spine (CFS) Master Plan, updated as PIRECFS 2022, encompasses four forest complexes providing up to 90% of Peninsular Malaysia's water supply; the Target 10 key indicator is 10 primary corridors actively protected and managed by 2030 [§180, §181]. The Heart of Borneo (HoB) is a voluntary tri-national programme covering approximately 200,000 km² of rainforest across Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, and Malaysia, with a key indicator of a 10% increase of protected areas within the HoB by 2030 [§182, §183]. The Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI) provides the seascape-level framework for marine ecological connectivity across a six-nation partnership [§177]. Connectivity is also the framing under which climate adaptation enters the policy: maintaining landscape and seascape connectivity is identified as crucial to enable species range shifts under temperature and environmental change [Target 8 analysis]. REDD+ Finance Framework operationalisation is tied to CFS and HoB through technical support to State governments pursuing REDD+ and voluntary forest carbon projects [§297].

5. Monitoring and Accountability

Progress on the NPBD 2022–2030 is reported every four years to the CBD, supported by an online monitoring system tracking the policy's targets and indicators [§314]. The MBC serves as the centre for monitoring, collating long-term research outputs, and providing periodic progress reports to higher coordinating platforms [§313]. Progress reports from Thematic Working Group meetings, alongside lessons learned from implemented projects, are collated by the Ministry in charge of biodiversity and forestry for Malaysia's subsequent National Report to the CBD and for public awareness [§314]. The Policy is to be reviewed every four or five years against achievements and priorities at national, State, and global levels [§315].

An annual National Biodiversity Conference brings stakeholders together to discuss implementation progress and identify thematic focal points for the following year; Thematic Working Groups can conduct their annual general meetings concurrently or prior to its commencement [§273, §314]. A Biodiversity Parliamentary Select Committee is to be established as a forum for Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate to submit recommendations to Parliament; the key indicator is that by 2030 the committee is actively supporting Parliament and its committees [§280, §281]. The Policy also commits to supporting Federal and State legislatures and the judiciary with information and scientific evidence, and to targeted outreach to the judiciary and public prosecutors on biodiversity-related offences [§280].

The Policy commits to establishing a framework for Strategic Environmental Assessments of sectoral policies and plans at the national and State levels [§273]. Project-level monitoring is strengthened via enhanced biodiversity components within Environmental Impact Assessments [Target 14 analysis, §93]. Capacity development is routed through the National Institute of Public Administration (INTAN), with a biodiversity conservation module to improve civil-servant awareness; human resource development prioritises taxonomy, wildlife veterinary sciences, and botany, with biodiversity-related careers committed to increase compared to 2024 levels [§277, §286, §287].

Sources:

  • §273–§316 — Implementation Framework (as cited)

6. Finance and Resource Mobilisation

The NPBD identifies funding as a long-term challenge, characterising it as low relative to the values that biodiversity and ecosystem services generate [§31]. The headline finance figure is the Target 17 indicator: at least RM500 million mobilised annually through public funds by 2030 [§295]. The policy notes that the scope for expanding public allocations "is severely limited" given competing post-COVID-19 recovery priorities [§289]. No overall biodiversity-finance-gap valuation is stated.

Existing mechanisms include three standing trust funds — the National Conservation Trust Fund for Natural Resources (NCTF), the Marine Parks Trust Fund, and the Taman Negara Trust Fund [§31]. The NCTF is to be strengthened "to enhance its impact, visibility, and sustainability" [§294]. The policy acknowledges that multilateral (UNDP, GEF, ITTO) and bilateral (DANIDA, JICA) sources of past support will become harder to access as Malaysia transitions out of developing-country status, driving the pivot to domestic and private finance instruments [§31].

Action 17.2 commits to operationalising the REDD+ Finance Framework (RFF) at national and/or sub-national levels with technical support to State governments pursuing REDD+ and voluntary forest carbon projects; establishing legal and financial mechanisms for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes in the Malaysian context; and engaging regulators and financial institutions to develop instruments "which blend commercial and concessional finance" [§297]. The key indicator is that private financing contributions into national and State conservation trust funds have increased by 2030 [§298].

Federal–State finance provisions include commitments to diversify State revenue streams (Action 17.3, led by the Ministry in charge of finance), Ecological Fiscal Transfers (EFT) entrenched into legal and institutional frameworks with performance-based criteria, a feasibility study for a debt-for-nature swap programme, and incentives and compensation mechanisms to offset opportunity costs of setting aside land for conservation [§290, §301, §333]. Financial-sector mainstreaming under Action 4.1 includes a national System of Environmental and Economic Accounting (SEEA) framework, a Sustainable and Responsible Taxonomy for Biodiversity, and a framework for biodiversity-related financial disclosure led by Bank Negara and Bursa Malaysia [§86]. Subsidy reform language — "redirect, reform, or eliminate perverse and harmful economic subsidies" — is repeated across agrofood, fisheries, and aquaculture actions without a baseline dollar value or quantified redirection target [§117]. A No Nett Loss approach is to be studied for feasibility in project approvals and is mandated for mining project approvals [§92, §98].

Sources:

  • §31 — The Challenge Before Us > Funding Capacity
  • §86, §92, §98, §117 — Policy Statement (Target 4 actions)
  • §289–§302 — Policy Statement > Target 17
  • §333 — Implementation Framework > Target 17

7. GBF Target Coverage

GBF Target 1 — Spatial planning: Addressed. National commitment 3 commits to fully incorporating biodiversity elements into terrestrial and marine spatial planning by 2030, extending spatial planning beyond the EEZ to international marine borders. Instruments: National Physical Plan, Environmentally Sensitive Area framework, upcoming National Coastal Physical Plan, revised State Structure Plans and Local Area Plans, with support for the National Action Plan on Peatlands and ASEAN Peatland Management Strategy 2023–2030. Indicator: important landscapes and seascapes integrated into national, State, and local development plans.

GBF Target 2 — Ecosystem restoration: Addressed. National commitment 9 targets at least 200,000 ha of degraded sites under active restoration by 2030, with polluter-pays application to restoration costs and prioritised collaborative approaches enabling IPLCs, NGOs, and the private sector. An ecosystem vulnerability map and adaptive-management actions for threatened ecosystems are committed.

GBF Target 3 — Protected areas (30×30): Addressed. National commitment 8 targets at least 20% of terrestrial areas and inland waters, and 10% of coastal and marine areas, conserved through an effectively managed, ecologically representative system of protected areas and OECMs — explicitly below the KMGBF 30×30 headline. Under-represented ecosystems — limestone hills, peat swamp forests, seagrass beds — are named for expanded coverage. Community Conserved Areas are recognised within the OECMs network. The three regional regimes (Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah, Sarawak) are acknowledged as distinct legal-institutional contexts. Supplemented by national commitment 10 on ecological corridors (CFS: 10 primary corridors; HoB: +10% protected areas).

GBF Target 4 — Species recovery: Addressed. National commitment 11 targets 10 ex-situ conservation centres actively contributing to species rescue by 2030, adopts a metapopulation approach integrating wild and captive populations, and uses artificial reproductive technologies within ex-situ conservation. Named flagship species: Malayan tiger, Indochinese and clouded leopards, ~11,300 Bornean orangutans, pangolins, sun bears, and gaharu. National Red Data List update committed; human-wildlife conflict reduction strategies and migratory-species conservation included.

GBF Target 5 — Sustainable harvest: Addressed. National commitment 12 targets a 50% increase in collaborative anti-poaching efforts compared to 2024, revival of the ASEAN Wildlife Enforcement Network, catch documentation schemes to curb IUU fishing, and demand reduction via partnerships with restaurants, pet shops, aquarium traders, and traditional medicine practitioners. Malaysia is identified as both a source and transit country for trafficked wildlife.

GBF Target 6 — Invasive alien species: Addressed. National commitment 13 anchors on the National Action Plan on Invasive Alien Species 2021–2025 and names Salvinia molesta (Kariba weed) and Oreochromis niloticus (Nile tilapia) as priority IAS. Multi-agency border control (KASTAM, MAQIS) is named for pathway interdiction; targeted response plans and control measures are committed.

GBF Target 7 — Pollution reduction: Mentioned. Pollution is treated under the Target 4 mainstreaming umbrella via Action 4.4 (strengthen pollution monitoring and regulation to protect freshwater and marine ecosystems), without a stand-alone national commitment. No quantified nutrient, pesticide, or plastics reduction targets are stated, despite acknowledgement of 0.94 million tonnes/year of mismanaged plastic since 2018.

GBF Target 8 — Climate and biodiversity: Mentioned. No stand-alone climate-biodiversity commitment. Climate is woven through urban green-space repurposing (Action 3.2), ecosystem-resilience planning (Action 9.3), species-monitoring (Action 11.1), and REDD+ Finance Framework operationalisation (Action 17.2). A projected RM162.53 million/year rice-production loss under a 2 °C rise is cited; no NbS-area or carbon-sequestration metric is set.

GBF Target 9 — Wild species use: Addressed. Covered through national commitment 6 fisheries actions (IUU catch documentation, Turtle Excluder Devices, electronic bycatch monitoring, perverse-subsidy reform), national commitment 7 tourism–conservation synergies (+30% IPLC tourism participation by 2030 vs 2024), and commitments to bring horticultural and medicinal species into cultivation to reduce pressure on wild populations. IPLC customary use (Penan, Batek Hep) acknowledged.

GBF Target 10 — Agriculture / forestry: Addressed. National commitments 5 and 6 deliver this target. Forest governance carries the 50% land-area forest-cover pledge and a 50% forestry-sector certification target under MTCS and FSC. Private-sector instruments include NDPE policies, HCV, MPOCC palm-oil certification, MTCC timber certification, and commitments for plantations to allocate and aggregate fragmented land for ecological corridors. Technology pathway: Earth-observation satellites and LiDAR for forest monitoring.

GBF Target 11 — Ecosystem services (NbS): Mentioned. No stand-alone commitment; treated as underpinning via Action 3.2 (urban green/blue spaces), Action 4.1 (SEEA, Sustainable and Responsible Taxonomy for Biodiversity, financial disclosure), and Action 17.2 (PES legal and financial mechanisms). No quantified NbS-beneficiary metric.

GBF Target 12 — Urban biodiversity: Addressed. Covered through Action 3.2 under national commitment 3. Commitments include maintaining gazetted green and water-reservoir land, repurposing brownfields for urban forests, green lungs, pocket parks, and urban gardens, native-species landscaping, and incentives for property developers. Named exemplar: Shah Alam Community Forest connected to Bukit Cerakah Forest Reserve. Indicator: biodiversity actively enhanced in all local authorities and townships by 2030.

GBF Target 13 — Genetic resources / ABS: Addressed. National commitment 14 enhances capacity to implement the ABS Framework, institutionalised through the Access to Biological Resources and Benefit Sharing Act 2017 and the Nagoya Protocol, with digital sequence information within scope. Prior Informed Consent is required where traditional knowledge is used; traditional-knowledge registries are to be integrated into the National Clearing-House Mechanism.

GBF Target 14 — Mainstreaming: Addressed. National commitment 4 is the direct vehicle. Instruments: SEEA, Sustainable and Responsible Taxonomy for Biodiversity, biodiversity-related financial disclosure, sectoral safeguards (linear-infrastructure habitat-fragmentation and wildlife-roadkill measures, dam and river-engineering safeguards, Marine Mammal Observer mandate on EEZ seismic vessels), strengthened EIA biodiversity components, and the One Health approach. Free, Prior, and Informed Consent named for projects affecting IPLCs.

GBF Target 15 — Business disclosure: Addressed. Delivered via Action 2.3 (embed biodiversity into ESG commitments of public-listed companies; scale up CSR/ESG among SMEs; strengthen the Malaysia Platform for Business and Biodiversity; implement a Business and Biodiversity Action Plan) and Action 4.1 (Sustainable and Responsible Taxonomy for Biodiversity; biodiversity-related financial disclosure framework via Bank Negara and Bursa Malaysia). Indicator: all public-listed companies reporting on biodiversity initiatives. No quantified coverage metric for large-firm disclosure is set beyond this.

GBF Target 16 — Sustainable consumption: Addressed. Covered via Action 4.6 under national commitment 4. Circular-economy mainstreaming is the delivery approach, with Supplier Relationship Management, Extended Producer Responsibility, and Polluter Pays frameworks expanded to evaluate supply chains. Commitment to establish the national consumption footprint by 2025 with reduction steps by 2030. No quantified per-capita footprint or food-waste-reduction metric.

GBF Target 17 — Biosafety: Addressed. National commitment 15 targets an operational comprehensive biosafety system, anchored on the Biosafety Act 2007 and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Emerging technologies (synthetic biology, genome editing) are explicitly within risk-assessment scope; a socio-economic impact-assessment mechanism and a legal framework for LMO liability and redress are committed by 2030.

GBF Target 18 — Harmful subsidies: Mentioned. No stand-alone commitment. The "redirect, reform, or eliminate perverse and harmful economic subsidies" formulation is repeated across agrofood, fisheries, and aquaculture actions; fishing-capacity overinvestment is explicitly named as a perverse incentive driver. No baseline valuation, redirection target, or dollar figure is stated.

GBF Target 19 — Finance mobilisation: Addressed. National commitment 17 targets RM500 million annually via public funds. Core instruments: REDD+ Finance Framework, Payment for Ecosystem Services legal and financial mechanisms, blended commercial-concessional finance, strengthened National Conservation Trust Fund, Ecological Fiscal Transfers, and a debt-for-nature-swap feasibility study. Explicit acknowledgement that Malaysia's graduation from developing-country status will constrain future multilateral and bilateral aid access (UNDP, GEF, ITTO, DANIDA, JICA). No overall resource-mobilisation-gap valuation is stated.

GBF Target 20 — Capacity and technology: Addressed. National commitment 16 commits to establishing and operationalising the Malaysia Biodiversity Centre; prioritising capacity needs; an active Biodiversity Parliamentary Select Committee; and biodiversity-related careers increased compared to 2024. Specialised-skills gaps named: taxonomy, wildlife veterinary sciences, botany. Remote sensing (Earth observation, LiDAR) is the principal named technology instrument.

GBF Target 21 — Data and information: Addressed. Delivered across multiple actions. Quantitative indicator: at least 30% of research effectively translated into policy papers by 2030. Instruments: strengthened national Clearing-House Mechanism, Natural History Museum–MBC specimen and record depository network, integration of IPLC traditional knowledge into the National CHM, online monitoring system, and four-yearly CBD reporting. No explicit open-data or free-access commitment.

GBF Target 22 — Inclusive participation: Addressed. National commitment 2 targets significantly strengthened IPLC, civil-society, private-sector, and academia roles. Free, Prior, and Informed Consent explicitly committed for projects affecting IPLCs; customary laws and community protocols recognised; environmental defenders' rights named as a civil-society protection commitment. Indicator: +30% IPLCs actively participating in tourism development by 2030 vs 2024.

GBF Target 23 — Gender equality: Mentioned. No stand-alone gender-equality commitment, no gender action plan, no gender-disaggregated indicators, and no lead agency named for gender integration. Gender appears only as a qualifier within Action 2.1 — empowering IPLCs "across all genders" and involvement of "women and children" in partnership arrangements. No commitments on equal rights of women and girls to land tenure, decision-making, or benefit-sharing are stated.